Welcome to Close Combat Series
  Login or Register Home  ·  Downloads  ·  Forums  ·  Combat Camera  ·  Help  

  Survey
Do incapacitations count as a soldier's kills?

Yes
No



Results
Polls

Votes 1338
Comments: 1

  Shout Box!!

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

  Main Menu
Articles & News  
    Help
    Player`s News
    Site News
    Multiplayer
    Terrain Challenge
    Boot Camp
Community  
    Forums
    Downloads
    Combat Camera
    MOOXE @ Youtube
    Statistics
Members  
    Private Messages
    Your Account
    Logout

  Donations
Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
12/18/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
11/08/2021

Anonymous - $15.00
04/09/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
04/05/2021

Anonymous - $20.00
02/20/2021

Anonymous - $10.00
12/29/2020

Anonymous - $1.00
11/06/2020

ZAPPI4 - $20.00
10/10/2020

Find our site useful? Make a small donation to show your support.



Search for at
Close Combat Series Advanced Search

Search found 3 matches
Close Combat Series Forum Index
 
 
Author Message
  Topic: Smoke Vs Tank
ttpistol

Replies: 4
Views: 4580

PostForum: The Mess   Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:44 pm   Subject: Smoke Vs Tank
Beautifull!My reply made you to be more precise in explanation of usage of smokescreen.Honestly,in war you use every means possible to distract,anoy or even destroy enemy.I have done the similar thing now.Throwing smoke.Acctually I am in support to certain level,for smoke in defense purposes.Also colors of smoke have many different ways of showing friend/foe situation.Please make a reply on that today smoke is again developed by many armies to cover from termovision cameras.Even sticking to optical devices that today tanks are so dependant.That why I love ww2 tanks.It was man,man,man.Right stuff.Today its bloody tehnology.To change subject,lets mention AT rifles that could not penetrate armor of tanks in ww2(medium to heavy)but distract aiming or vision of tank crew,making light damage,forcing tanks to change plans for action.
  Topic: Bazooka ”HEAT” weapons vs Panther! Real live test!
ttpistol

Replies: 36
Views: 30156

PostForum: The Mess   Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:01 pm   Subject: Bazooka ”HEAT” weapons vs Panther! Real live test!
...and nobody thinks again on infantry that is mounted on tanks,exposed to small arms gunfire,schurtzen is only to protect tank of course,there is no multipurpose usage of additional armour...
  Topic: Smoke Vs Tank
ttpistol

Replies: 4
Views: 4580

PostForum: The Mess   Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:42 pm   Subject: Smoke Vs Tank
Using smoke was then,in era of ww2,a cheap trick to smokescreen the infantry from running away from that armored force.LETS USE SIMPLE EXPLOSIVES AND CHEAP INFANTRY.USE SMOKE TO PREPARE.PLEASE TANKS,STAY STILL UNTIL WE PUT MINES ON YOUR ARMOUR.Nobody use it today.Period.If it is any good how that today the bloody tanks throw smoke to cover THEMSELVES from rocets and other infantry antitank weapons?why ww2 era US soldiers take captured panzerfaust,bazookas,calling air support to fight against tanks and NOT wasting time with choking to death tank crews?Test is too basic,there is no enemy infantry which covers tanks and vice versa.
 
 
 
Page 1 of 1
Time synchronized with your computer time
Jump to:  




Forums ©





In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited and
found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some of the great Close Combat
mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank all the members of our volunteer staff that have
helped over the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!